The best translation of Meditations, compared

For most first-time readers of Marcus Aurelius, Gregory Hays’s 2002 translation is the one to start with, because it reads like a person thinking rather than a Victorian sermon. If you want it free, George Long’s 1862 translation is in the public domain and complete online. Those two answers cover almost everybody.

Why does the translation matter so much for Meditations?

It matters more here than for almost any other ancient text, for a specific reason: Meditations was never written to be read. It is a private notebook, in Greek, by a Roman emperor writing to himself with no audience in mind and no intention of publishing.

That leaves translators with far more room than usual. The Greek is compressed, elliptical and sometimes ungrammatical, because a man writing a note to himself does not finish every thought. One translator resolves that into stately formal English. Another resolves it into something closer to how the thought probably felt. Both are defensible, and they produce books that read almost nothing alike.

The practical consequence: people who bounce off Meditations often bounced off a translation rather than off Marcus Aurelius.

The main translations compared

TranslatorYearRegisterCostBest for
George Long1862Victorian, formal, archaic pronounsFree, public domainQuoting, studying, and reading without spending anything
Gregory Hays2002Modern, plain, deliberately unpoeticPaidA first read, and for anyone who found older versions impenetrable
Martin Hammond2006Modern but more literal, heavily annotatedPaidA second read, when you want to see the seams
Robin Waterfield2021Modern, scholarly, strong introductionPaidReaders who want the historical context alongside the text

The same passage, four ways

PLACEHOLDER. This section is not finished. It needs one short passage set out in each of the four translations, with the modern three quoted only briefly and attributed. It is left empty rather than filled from memory, because putting words a translator did not write next to their name would be worse than having no comparison at all. Delete this paragraph once the real text is in.

Which should you actually buy?

Three readers, three answers.

  • You have never read it and you want to finish it. Hays. It is the version most likely to survive contact with an actual evening.
  • You want to spend nothing. Long, free and complete on Project Gutenberg. The English is dated, and it is a real translation by a serious scholar, not an abridgement.
  • You have read it once and want to go deeper. Hammond or Waterfield. Both give you the apparatus that Hays deliberately strips out.

Where can you read Meditations free?

George Long’s translation is in the public domain and available complete on Project Gutenberg, at no cost and with no signup. It is the version quoted throughout this site, for the same reason: it can be quoted in full, and a source you cannot check is not much of a source.

How to read it without bouncing off

Three things help more than choosing the perfect translation.

  1. Start at Book 2, not Book 1. Book 1 is a list of thanks to relatives and teachers. It is touching once you know the man and baffling as an opening.
  2. Do not read it as an argument. It does not build. It circles, repeats and contradicts itself, because he was writing the same reminders to himself for years.
  3. A passage a day beats a chapter a night. The book was written in fragments and it survives being read in fragments better than almost anything else.

That last point is why the year-long version exists. Daily Wisdom: Stoicism takes Marcus Aurelius alongside Seneca and Epictetus across 365 days, one passage and one practice at a time, for readers who keep starting Meditations and stopping.